Essay on Holi Holi is one of the most colourful and ancient festivals of India. It is a very important day for the Hindus. It is mostly celebrated on the month of February or March. The arrival of Holi means saying goodbye to the winters.
Philosophers have looked for ways to explain God's existence for centuries. One such argument that the believer must justify in order to maintain the possibility of God's existence is the problem of evil.
In his essay, "The Problem of Evil," by Richard Swinburne, the author attempts to explain how evil can exist in a world created by an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent Being, namely God.
Swinburne uses to free-will defense and says that God gave us a choice between doing good and doing evil. If someone chooses to do good over evil, then that Good is greater than if one had no choice at all but to do good.
This is a weak argument and in order to clarify those weaknesses one can look at Steven M. Cahn's essay entitled "Cacodaemony.
By looking at how weak the argument for cacodaemony is, one can see how unlikely it is that the Demon exists and then can see that the existence of God is just as Evil everyone essay.
In "The Problem of Evil", Swinburne says that an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent Being created the world. If this were true, how can evil exist in this world? If God consciously knew He was creating a world in which there is evil, then He would not be omnibenevolent.
If God did not know He was creating a world in which evil exists, then He would not be omniscient.
If God is omnipotent then He would be able to stop any evil from occurring. Either way, God would not be Evil everyone essay Christianity makes him out to be. Swinburne argues that the theodicist, one who believes that it is not wrong for God to create a world in which there is evil, can logically explain the existence of evil in the world.
The main argument that the theodicist uses is the free-will defense which claims that God gave humans the freedom to choose between doing acts of good and acts of evil.
The theodicist argues that the good person could do is greater if it is chosen instead of doing evil. It is better to choose to walk an elderly person across the road instead of deciding to push the elderly person in front of an oncoming car.
The theodicist believes that it is better for a person to have that choice, though nearly everyone would naturally choose to help the person across the street, than to have no choice at all and be forced to help that person. Swinburne writes that giving people a moral responsibility to do the right thing is good.
This, however, does not justify the amount of pain and suffering in the world.
If someone were to consciously choose to do an evil act over a good one, the suffering caused to the innocent people involved would not be right.
There are some people with mental disorders or those born with retardation that do not have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong or who sometimes suffer from lack of proper judgment. These people cannot make a choice between good and evil, so sometimes they do evil acts, and sometimes they do good ones.
Would it not be better for these people not to have the choice, a choice that they may not be fit to make? For example, a man who is schizophrenic may hear voices that tell him to do something that he knows is morally wrong, such as kill somebody.
Would it not be better for God to intervene and make this person's judgment better?
It most certainly would be better for God to intervene and give this person a proper sense of right and wrong and the ability to do the right thing. It would have been a better world if God had created Hitler so that he would not feel the need to order the massacre of millions of Jews. Swinburne, however, thinks that it is better for these people to have a choice to do wrong or to do right.
Swinburne argues that, although evils are bad, their existence is necessary for the existence of some types of goods. Certain evils that occur, such as the suffering of others, cause us to be compassionate, courageous, self-sacrificing, etc.
Swinburne says that these are goods that exist because of the existence of evil. Someone who sees a woman getting raped may show courage and compassion by trying to stop the rapist.
It is illogical, however, to say, that it is a good thing that woman was getting raped so that the kindhearted citizen could intervene.
This woman would still suffer from the mental tortures of being violated. Even though it was a courageous thing that the person stopped the rape, the woman would be better off if the rape had not even happened at all. Women as a whole would feel a lot safer if rape did not exist.
Yet it is an evil and it does exist and the compassion and may feel towards a victim of this evil does not make the victim better off than if there never existed such a thing as rape. If no one were in pain, then it is true that goods such as compassion would not exist.
How can it be justified, however, that it is good that some suffer so that others can exhibit good traits? Those people can try and bring others who are in pain happiness and relief, but many others will still experience pain both physical and mental.Chapter 3: Philosophy of Religion. Proofs for the Existence of God.
In his essay “Evil and Soul-Making,” John Hick attempts to justify the problem of evil. It is a theodicy cased on the free will defense. He goes out of the store and crosses the street and kills everyone of the women. Since several of my previous essays have been linked to Rand’s moral condemnation of Immanuel Kant (), especially her infamous remark that Kant was “the most evil man in mankind’s history” (The Objectivist, Sept.
), I thought I would write a conciliatory essay or two about the moral and political theory of this villainous character whose evil supposedly exceeded that of.
Evil is the convincing serpent which tempts all men with its forbidden fruit. Most individuals swiftly recognize the consequences of a nefarious existence and continue to lead moral and productive lives.
Below is an essay on "The Possibility Of Evil" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples. In “The Possibility of Evil” by Shirley Jackson, the author gives a positive image on reader’s opinion(s) of the main by using both character and behaviour traits.
Why the Brett Kavanaugh “Evil Twin” Theory Is So Diabolical It says everything you need to know about how seriously the GOP takes Christine Blasey Ford. Augustine: on evil. Many people will tell you that evil is a necessary part of the world. Just ask and you can get many people to agree to a claim such as; "There cannot be good without bad." This is a metaphysical idea about the structure of reality.